Climate Change and Agriculture
What we eat and how we produce our food are inextricably linked to the climate crisis. Science makes it clear that to avert the worst impacts of climate change, we must address the greenhouse gas. Jun 01, · 9) What are we actually doing to fight climate change? A global problem requires global action, but with climate change, there is a yawning gap between ambition and action.
Thinking about year-end donations to nonprofits focused on issues related to climate change? A lot of organizations are working in this area and evaluating them is tough. How do you measure carbon not produced? Which nonprofits should you support? These are just a few of many good nonprofits working to clobber climate change.
Founded by author Bill McKibben, is probably the most famous cclimate change-focused organization. Use Charity Navigator: The Environmental Defense Fund has a history of innovative approaches to environmental issues. They began by pioneering litigation on behalf of the environment to fight DDT in the s. In the s, they began working with economists to develop market-based environmental solutions, and in the s, they took the fraught step of developing corporate sponsorships. Their climate work includes support for clean energy, reducing what is climate change doing to the earth impacts of natural gas, promoting sustainable land use over deforestation, and working with the Chinese government to develop market-based emissions reductions.
Earthjustice fights on many fronts, but climate protection is part of its mission statement. Recent wins include stopping discriminatory fees for solar power users in Arizona. Nowhere is the danger voing misunderstanding and ignoring solid science more evident than the way the U.
The Union of Concerned Scientists was founded at MIT to share information, seek the truth, and enable scientific findings to guide public policy and actions. UCS has helped improve fuel efficiency standards, advocated for renewable energy, protected rainforests, what is climate change doing to the earth fought tirelessly against anti-science government policies.
After many years opposing increased reliance oding nuclear power, UCS now suggests how to apply pomade for waves is a reasonable part of the climate solution. Too new to be reviewed by Charity Navigator, The Solutions Project is working to go the United States to percent renewable energy by based on a state transition plan developed by Stanford University what is saturn made of composition. They focus on equity and serving those who are most impacted by climate change.
Feature image:Pixabay. This article was originally published on December 14, Gemma Alexander has an M. After working in a genetics laboratory and at a landfill, she now writes about the environment, the arts and family. See more of her writing here. Skip to content. By Gemma Alexander Dec 16, Climate Doinydonatenonprofitsnonprofits-clobbering-climate-change.
Image: skeeze, Pixabay Union of Concerned Scientists Nowhere is the danger of misunderstanding and ignoring solid science more evident than the way the U. Image: Adobe Stock The Solutions Project Too new to be reviewed by Charity Navigator, The Solutions Project is working to convert the United States to percent renewable energy by based on a state transition plan developed by Stanford University researchers.
Charity Navigator: unrated Charity Watch: unrated BBB Accredited: no The Solutions Project invests in community-based organizations and leaders who are removing barriers to affordable clean energy. Image: skeeze, Pixabay Feature image:Pixabay. Related Post. Apr 16, Earth Apr 15, Gemma Alexander.
You can help
Changes in climate and extreme weather events have already begun to affect people and nature across the globe. And climate change exacerbates other threats like habitat destruction, overexploitation of wildlife, and disease. From the shrinking habitat of the polar bear to increased water scarcity. The earth's climate is changing. Dr Anna Hogg warns about the effects of global warming for people and the environment. The current changes in the planet's climate are transforming the world. The last two decades included 18 of the warmest years on record, and extreme weather events, such as forest. 2 days ago · Declining planetary funding and growing scientific interest in the Earth's climate caused planetary scientists to start studying the Earth. It was closer, and much less expensive, to do research on. And NASA followed suit, starting to plan for an Earth observing system aimed at questions of "global change.".
Political fissures on climate issues extend far beyond beliefs about whether climate change is occurring and whether humans are playing a role, according to a new, in-depth survey by Pew Research Center. There are also major divides in the way partisans interpret the current scientific discussion over climate, with the political left and right having vastly divergent perceptions of modern scientific consensus, differing levels of trust in the information they get from professional researchers, and different views as to whether it is the quest for knowledge or the quest for professional advancement that drives climate scientists in their work.
When it comes to party divides, the biggest gaps on climate policy and climate science are between those at the ends of the political spectrum. Across the board, from possible causes to who should be the one to sort this all out, liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans see climate-related matters through vastly different lenses. Perhaps it follows, then, that liberal Democrats are much more inclined to believe a wide variety of environmental catastrophes are potentially headed our way, and that both policy and individual actions can be effective in heading some of these off.
And, a majority of conservative Republicans believe that each of the six actions to address climate change can make no more than a small difference. Democrats are especially likely to see scientists and their research in a positive light. A few examples:. Few in either party say climate scientists should have no role in policy decisions. To the extent there are political differences among Americans on these issues, those variances are largely concentrated when it comes to their views about climate scientists, per se, rather than scientists, generally.
Majorities of all political groups report a fair amount of confidence in scientists, overall, to act in the public interest. And to the extent that Republicans are personally concerned about climate issues, they tend to hold more positive views about climate research. Liberal Democrats are especially inclined to believe harms from climate change are likely and that both policy and individual actions can be effective in addressing climate change.
Among the political divides over which actions could make a difference in addressing climate change:. The stakes in climate debates seem particularly high to liberal Democrats because they are especially likely to believe that climate change will bring harms to the environment.
Among this group, about six-in-ten say climate change will very likely bring more droughts, storms that are more severe, harm to animals and to plant life, and damage to shorelines from rising sea levels. But Republicans with higher science knowledge are no more or less likely to hold these beliefs. These are some of the principle findings from a new Pew Research Center survey. Most of the findings in this report are based on a nationally representative survey of 1, U.
The margin of sampling error for the full sample is plus or minus 4 percentage points. But, they come from a range of age and education groups and from all regions of the country. There are wide differences in beliefs about climate issues and climate scientists between this more concerned public and other Americans, among both Democrats and Republicans alike. At the same time, this more concerned public is quite optimistic about efforts to address climate change.
Majorities among this group say that each of six different personal and policy actions asked about can be effective in addressing climate change. Further, those with deep concerns about climate issues are much more inclined to hold climate scientists and their work in positive regard. This group is more likely than others to see scientists as understanding climate issues. Conservative Republicans stand out as more negative in their overall views about climate change news coverage.
Public ratings of the media may be linked to views about the mix of news coverage. Though the survey finds that climate scientists are viewed with skepticism by relatively large shares of Americans, scientists overall — and in particular, medical scientists — are viewed as relatively trustworthy by the general public. Asked about a wide range of leaders and institutions, the military, medical scientists, and scientists in general received the most votes of confidence when it comes to acting in the best interests of the public.
On the flip side, majorities of the public have little confidence in the news media, business leaders and elected officials. Most Americans also have at least a fair amount of confidence in medical scientists and scientists to act in the best interest of the public.
Confidence in either group is about the same or only modestly different across party and ideological groups. Confidence in the news media, business leaders and elected officials is considerably lower; public views about school and religious leaders fall in the middle. People in both political parties express deep distrust of elected officials, in keeping with previous Pew Research Center studies showing near record low trust in government.
One spot of unity in an otherwise divided environmental policy landscape is that the vast majority of Americans support the concept of expanding both solar and wind power. The public is more closely divided when it comes to expanding fossil fuel energies such as coal mining, offshore oil and gas drilling, and hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural gas.
While there are substantial party and ideological divides over increasing fossil fuel and nuclear energy sources, strong majorities of all political groups support more solar and wind production.
These patterns are broadly consistent with past Center findings that climate change and fossil fuel energy issues are strongly linked with party and ideology, but political divisions have a much more modest or no relationship with public attitudes on a host of other science-related topics.
Their reasons include both cost savings and help for the environment. Western residents and younger adults ages 18 to 49 are especially likely to say they have considered, or already installed, solar panels at home.
While most Americans espouse some concern for the environment, a much smaller share says they always try to live in ways that help the environment. How different are the actual behaviors of Americans who live out their concerns for the environment all the time from the rest of the public? They are more likely to buy a cleaning product because its ingredients would be better for the environment, but again, most do so no more than sometimes.
And they are no more likely than other Americans to reduce and reuse at home by composting, having a rain barrel or growing their own vegetables. Nor are environmentally conscious Americans more likely than other people to have spent hobby and leisure time hiking, camping, hunting or fishing in the past year. There is one way in which environmentally conscious Americans stand out attitudinally, however. They are much more likely to be bothered when other people waste energy by leaving lights on or not recycling properly.
In times of uncertainty, good decisions demand good data. Please support our research with a financial contribution. About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world.
It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts. Home U. Main More. Confidence in scientists and other groups to act in the public interest Though the survey finds that climate scientists are viewed with skepticism by relatively large shares of Americans, scientists overall — and in particular, medical scientists — are viewed as relatively trustworthy by the general public.
Strong bipartisan support for expanding solar, wind energy production One spot of unity in an otherwise divided environmental policy landscape is that the vast majority of Americans support the concept of expanding both solar and wind power. Boom for home solar ahead? One-in-five Americans aim for everyday environmentalism; their political and climate change beliefs mirror the U.
Next: 1. Facts are more important than ever In times of uncertainty, good decisions demand good data. Popular on pew research. Americans overwhelmingly say marijuana should be legal for recreational or medical use.
Quiz: Are you a Core Conservative? A Solid Liberal? Or somewhere in between? Research Areas. Follow Us. We need to confirm your email address. To complete the subscription process, please click the link in the email we just sent you.